Quantitative Research
Statistically validated trading signals. Updated daily.
✅ Validated Signals
| Study | Events | Return | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
H3: Retail Panic + Foreign Buy
Retail sells >1σ below mean while foreign buys
|
4,209 | +0.91% | <0.0001 |
|
H6: Shareholder Surge + Big Holder Exit
Holders +5% in 4 weeks while big-holder % drops
|
396 | -0.87% | — |
|
SITC vs Foreign Divergence
SITC wins on mid-caps (local info edge)
|
8,416 | +0.25% | — |
|
Supply Chain Propagation (1-day lag)
TSMC buying → MediaTek follows next day
|
71 edges | corr 0.18 | — |
❌ Rejected Hypotheses
| Hypothesis | Finding |
|---|---|
| Follow foreign consecutive buying | p > 0.3, no alpha. Foreign is contrarian, following doesn't work. |
| Institutional front-running revenue | 51% random. No insider evidence. Institutions don't know revenue ahead. |
| Revenue beat → drift up | Reversed! Beat stocks -1.95%. Sell-the-news effect. |
| News volume → institutional flow | Correlation r = -0.02 (zero). Institutions don't trade on headlines. |
💡 Core Insight
"Foreign institutions are contrarian accumulators. They buy when retail panics and exit when retail is euphoric. Following them doesn't work — but fading retail panic does."
🔬 Advanced Findings
| Finding | Effect | Events |
|---|---|---|
|
H3 strongest in Optoelectronics
Retail panic in 光電 stocks bounces 5.7x more than Computer stocks
|
+4.42% | 268 |
|
3σ Buy anomalies have momentum
Unusual buying continues to gain over 20 days (momentum)
|
+0.83% | 498 |
|
3σ Sell anomalies bounce back
Unusual selling is temporary/liquidity-driven, stocks recover
|
+0.64% | 510 |
|
Monday always sells
Monday is always net selling regardless of Friday. If Friday also sold, Monday selling is 6x worse.
|
-104M | 51 Fridays |
|
Dividend pre-positioning
Select high-yield stocks see elevated foreign buying in May-Jul
|
+2-3x | 30 stocks |
|
M&A news → foreign de-risking
On M&A/capital change news days, foreign avg sells -4M (uncertainty de-risking)
|
-4.0M | 1,300 |
📊 Retail FOMO Index
Composite of ETF retail flow, shareholder growth rate, and market-wide retail net (0-100)
Historically, retail fear (<30) often coincides with smart money accumulation.
📚 Academic References
• Sammon & Viceira (2025) — Harvard: Retail contrarian trading contributes to PEAD
• Barber, Lee, Liu, Odean (2009) — UC Davis: Taiwan retail loses 3.8%/yr, institutions gain 1.5%
• Lin & Hung (2012) — Emerald: Foreign institutions trade contrarian in Taiwan (buy losers, sell winners)
• TEJ (2025): TDCC shareholder data constructs predictive retail speculation factor
Disclaimer: Research for informational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results.
📅 Research Log
Total: 22 studies | 5 validated signals | 4 rejected hypotheses | Coverage: institutional flow, shareholder structure, margin, futures/options, intraday, news